Governor Terry McAuliffe, Virginia Politics, African American Politics, African American Vote, Black Vote, KOLUMN Magazine, KOLUMN

Va. High Court Invalidates McAuliffe’s Order Restoring Felon Voting Rights

Read Time 2 min.

Va. High Court Invalidates McAuliffe’s Order Restoring Felon Voting Rights

[three_fourth padding=”0 0px 0 0px”]Va. High Court Invalidates McAuliffe’s Order Restoring Felon Voting Rights
2 5 | J U L Y | 2 0 1 6

Gov. Terry McAuliffe’s decision to restore voting rights to more than 200,000 felons violates Virginia’s constitution, the state Supreme Court ruled Friday, dealing a major blow to the Democratic governor with implications for the November presidential race in the crucial swing state.

BY   Fenit Nirappil   &   Jenna Portnoy  |  PUBLICATION   The Washington Post 

[dropcap]In[/dropcap] a 4-to-3 decision, the court ruled that McAuliffe overstepped his clemency powers by issuing a sweeping order in April restoring rights to all ex-offenders who are no longer incarcerated or on probation or parole.

The court agreed with state Republicans who challenged McAuliffe’s order, arguing that the governor can only restore voting rights on a case-by-case basis and not en masse.

“Never before have any of the prior 71 Virginia Governors issued a clemency order of any kind — including pardons, reprieves, commutations, and restoration orders — to a class of unnamed felons without regard for the nature of the crimes or any other individual circumstances relevant to the request,” Chief Justice Donald W. Lemons wrote for the majority. “To be sure, no Governor of this Commonwealth, until now, has even suggested that such a power exists.” [mc4wp_form id=”6042″][/three_fourth]

SOUTHERN UNITED STATES – State and Local laws enforcing racial segregation
Enacted after the Reconstruction period, these laws continued in force until 1965. They mandated de jure racial segregation in all public facilities in states of the former Confederate States of America, starting in 1890 with a “separate but equal” status for African Americans. Facilities for African Americans were consistently inferior and underfunded compared to those available to white Americans; sometimes they did not exist at all. This body of law institutionalized a number of economic, educational, and social disadvantages. De jure segregation mainly applied to the Southern states, while Northern segregation was generally de facto — patterns of housing segregation enforced by private covenants, bank lending practices, and job discrimination, including discriminatory labor union practices.
More | Jim Crow Laws Wikipedia

[three_fourth padding=”0 0px 0 0px”]

CONTINUE READING @   The Washington Post [/three_fourth]